When one makes on shoe he is called as a cobbler , you sew
one cloth you are called darzi , you make food for one house you will be called
what I donot know but what I know that if you are cutting hairs of richs , you
are called as “hair dresser” and making many shoes you become “shoe designer”
that is leader of cobblers become Footware designer or a business man , what
changes there is “profit” , in terms of selling large number of shoes large
profit changes designation but work remains same and that is of “making shoes”
and similarly a darzi becomes fashion designer only because he/she sew cloths
of richs like Anil Ambani or his elder brother or people like him. Rich owner
rich servant but designations of rich servants have been changed to more
sophisticated forms like there
sophisticated owner. At the end of day an IAS officer in India is a public
servant at least according to constitution of India.
Our society setup has been designed to only facilitate richs
or in another words we can say that social system has been designed to ease or
justify acts of richs definitely with some control which makes them only King
maker not King actually.
A recent news about few dance girls dancing in a local
cricket match at a district of Bihar named Samastipur grabbed attention of many
, I donot know the reason as I have been watching beautiful girls with only
undergarments dancing in high paying 20-20 matches every day , only difference
what I felt was that at Local match ground match , girls where not
sophisticated and were actually wearing some cloths and probably they came from
a society which is only accepted by middle class men at night and specially
when they are aloof but only problem was that middle class or lower earning
class was trying to imitate richs in their own style or according to their own
capacity , so their dancers were not costly dancers and probably their nights
were open in public and dancers of 20-20 matches have richs as their clients
even after match whose quantity is less and thus their nights are only known to
richs and not described in public. So when richs were enjoying their part of
beauty it was their duty and how could it be right while same act by middle
class or poor earning class be wrong just because their payment structure is
low. I donot think so , what do you say ?
