its just not right

Richs are only future of poors and thus act of poors can not be wrong , although an activity of murder can not be justified unless it is in self defence under life threatening conditions but any way for some one it becomes murder and for some one it becomes life saving event , whom to justify probably who lived to justify themselves I do not understand.  In one or another form it has been rightly said survival of fittest and those who survives are right , probably if Hitler would have own second world war History would have been different . How can we forget case of Italian Marine crew in Indian sea where they shot dead two Indian fishermen , although it was not something they did intentionally , rather they thought them to be Somalian Pirates but for two families or whole nation it was serious case of murder , but in this case what an irony money proved its might again , family of dead got Rs 1cr and they were happy , although there can be different argument on it as well like “one who has gone cannot come back , how family will survive , one who had to go has gone and many different arguments to justify act of those two sisters who accepted  ransom of Rs 1 cr blood bathed with their brother , although I am no one who can justify their act or even say that what they did is wrong , else people will ask me “will I pay for their livelihood” why will I. I work hard to get mine , could not they work , but no. They choose another way out , a way which gave proper sleep to our congress president Sonia Gandhi , who actually belonged to Italy. So again I would ask , what you will call it . Right or wrong , Nothing is right , nothing is wrong its only the way you see things , My way could not justify acceptance of 1cr Rs and letting killers of their brother go by taking off the case where as actual victim found it acceptable and accepted it gladly.  I do not say that , what those two girls did was wrong but what I meant is that Rs 1 cr is less , rest everything is fine . I would not have settled in anything less than  100 cr ( maybe I am being rude but I am like this only)

Some time I think , who are we , what are we doing , although I understand that what so ever I am doing is Just planned and for some one its good and for some one its not but why am i doing it and whats ultimate goal to be achieved by all these arrays of mine , I do not know this.

Here I am going to share one another thought of mine , please do let me know whether I am write or not , at least according to you.

There is nothing natural in human being or specifically what I meant to say is that human being is just an advanced or most advanced form of self reproducing robot , Now many eyebrows may go up and many may consider me as an idiot but I have argument for it and I am going to back it hence further.

Life theory

When one makes on shoe he is called as a cobbler , you sew one cloth you are called darzi , you make food for one house you will be called what I donot know but what I know that if you are cutting hairs of richs , you are called as “hair dresser” and making many shoes you become “shoe designer” that is leader of cobblers become Footware designer or a business man , what changes there is “profit” , in terms of selling large number of shoes large profit changes designation but work remains same and that is of “making shoes” and similarly a darzi becomes fashion designer only because he/she sew cloths of richs like Anil Ambani or his elder brother or people like him. Rich owner rich servant but designations of rich servants have been changed to more sophisticated forms  like there sophisticated owner. At the end of day an IAS officer in India is a public servant at least according to constitution of India. 

Our society setup has been designed to only facilitate richs or in another words we can say that social system has been designed to ease or justify acts of richs definitely with some control which makes them only King maker not King actually.

A recent news about few dance girls dancing in a local cricket match at a district of Bihar named Samastipur grabbed attention of many , I donot know the reason as I have been watching beautiful girls with only undergarments dancing in high paying 20-20 matches every day , only difference what I felt was that at Local match ground match , girls where not sophisticated and were actually wearing some cloths and probably they came from a society which is only accepted by middle class men at night and specially when they are aloof but only problem was that middle class or lower earning class was trying to imitate richs in their own style or according to their own capacity , so their dancers were not costly dancers and probably their nights were open in public and dancers of 20-20 matches have richs as their clients even after match whose quantity is less and thus their nights are only known to richs and not described in public. So when richs were enjoying their part of beauty it was their duty and how could it be right while same act by middle class or poor earning class be wrong just because their payment structure is low. I donot think so , what do you say ?